Seher Shah’s “Constructed Landscapes”

With degrees in art and architecture, artist Seher Shah’s areas of interest include overlapping historical and geographical elements, reconstructing modernist architecture and urban monuments, and examining futurist landscapes.

Seher Shah, “Object Relic (Unite d’Habitation),” 2012, Graphite and gauche on paper. Private C: Seher Shah
24-Hour Time-Lapse of Object Repetition (Line to Distance), 2013 by Seher Shah
Seher Shah, Top view of “Object Repetition (Line to Distance),” 2011, Cast hydrocal objects with ink, Dimensions variable.
Seher Shah, Detail of “Object Repetition (Line to Distance),” 2011, Cast hydrocal objects with ink, Dimensions variable.
Seher Shah, Detail of “Object Repetition (Line to Distance),” 2011, Cast hydrocal objects with ink, Dimensions variable.
Seher Shah, “Geometric Landscapes and the Spectacle of Force,” 2009, Archival giclee print.
Seher Shah, “The Mirror Spectacle,” 2010, Archival giclee print.

Artist Seher Shah (b. 1975, Pakistan) discusses the intersection of architecture and drawing in her work. With degrees in art and architecture, Shah’s areas of interest include overlapping historical and geographical elements, reconstructing modernist architecture and urban monuments, and examining futurist landscapes. Austin's AMOA-Arthouse (now The Contemporary Austin) presented Shah’s first solo exhibition, “Constructed Landscapes,” earlier this spring.

You attended the Rhode Island School of Design for both visual art and architecture. How do your overlapping degrees translate into your work?

I am interested in the effects of rendering a space and how various mapping constructions can be represented through architecture, landscape, and objects. I try to engage with representations of the formal qualities of particular moments in architectural history through drawing, sculpture, and photography. There is a difference between an artist who is interested in architectural space and its representations and the practice of a working architect.

Much of your work is influenced by modernist and brutalist architectural styles of the mid-20th century, especially that of Le Corbusier. How did your interest in this style arise?

The hierarchy that exists in the spaces we inhabit, whether on an urban or individual scale, is something that continues to interest me. I consistently research brutalist buildings, and I am really intrigued by these structures. “Object Relic (Unité d’Habitation)” directly references the Le Corbusier project. For this drawing, I considered how brutalism affects the relationship between the landscape and the object. I find that drawing always allows for a visceral way to construct these landscapes.

Can you talk about the history and process behind “Geometric Landscapes and the Spectacle of Force” and “The Mirror Spectacle”?

My drawings explore the power dynamics of amphitheaters, civic buildings, mortuary architecture, and large-scale housing projects by removing hierarchy through specific methods of rendering. These events and objects are simultaneously fascinating and perplexing because they show the power struggles and aspirations of the context in which they are located.

 

The source of my inspiration for these two works was a photograph of the Delhi Durbar, an amphitheater in Delhi that hosted several military events and ceremonies. I reconstructed the semicircle of the amphitheater through layers of drawing and digital processes. By intentionally flattening the perspective, I employed a drawing method that created an alternative view of a historical event and removed the hierarchy involved in the photographic image.

You studied architecture and worked briefly as an architect. Can you talk about your drawings and sculptures in relationship to the architectural processes of drawing and building?

I am definitely getting more involved with objects and sculptures, and I am experimenting with the role of mark-making in drawing — marks that are not trying to create depth through perspective, but are about simple repetitive marks on a surface. I’m slowly working towards studies that incorporate objects and drawing together. “Object Repetition (Line to Distance)” was the initial meeting of this relationship between mark-making, objects, and an actual site-specific space.

There are structures within the drawings that I would like to further develop as the basis of physical objects. But the flattening of the forms within the drawing creates an ambiguous relationship to depth and form.

Are the geometric forms in your work largely invented, or do you appropriate the shapes from existing architectural spaces?

It depends on the work at hand and how the process of making it develops. Some of the monument forms in the drawings are based on historical context, while others experiment with pure form and mass.

The drawing “Object Relic (Unité d’Habitation)” uses the forms to explore the formal and visceral qualities of this idealized modernist project by Le Corbusier. The role of the architect, the use of scale, and the contradictory principles inherent in these plans are a few of the reasons I was attracted to the project. But the forms are taken directly from the elevations of the building. I then proceed to flatten out the height and mass, and situate them in a constructed landscape. 

Rachel Adams is associate curator of exhibitions and public programs at The Contemporary Austin.

This article is expanded content for Texas Architect, July/August 2013.

by: Rachel Adams

Talk About It

There are no comments yet, be the first!